|
Post by Kage Chaos on Sept 19, 2006 7:51:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by twilightblade on Sept 19, 2006 13:53:51 GMT -5
Yep, worth watching. They even did a good sequel. I was surprised. Sequels are always bad. It's a rule or something. But if they did a good one, then this one should be just as great! Thanks for putting it up Kage.
|
|
|
Post by blossom on Sept 19, 2006 13:57:38 GMT -5
You've got to go and watch it even if it's rubbish just to say you have.
But twilight's right, the sequel was good, so I don't see why this one shouldn't be.
|
|
|
Post by Kage Chaos on Sept 19, 2006 14:10:45 GMT -5
Yeah, as long as they don't screw up the bad guys, it should turn out good. Venom is a pretty important character.
|
|
|
Post by fantasy on Sept 20, 2006 9:41:09 GMT -5
They all rock.
|
|
|
Post by silver on Oct 14, 2006 3:28:06 GMT -5
They're going to have to be pretty careful with the storyline (I hate when in the third of trilogies they try to stuff a bunch of stuff in there) but I think this is definitely worth checking out.
|
|
|
Post by Halthorn on Nov 7, 2006 16:13:48 GMT -5
They're going to have to be pretty careful with the storyline (I hate when in the third of trilogies they try to stuff a bunch of stuff in there) but I think this is definitely worth checking out. ROFL! If that wasn't a reference to X-Men III I don't know what it was. But seriously. Eric freakin' Forman as Venom (yes I know that's not his real name) they had better tread lightly. It has the potential to suck. I did enjoy the other two very much. This is a difficult topic though, because how venom came to be in the comics was different than the cartoon. Anyone know which one they are going by? (yes I'm a nerd xP)
|
|